The October 2, 2015 edition of the New Scientist had two interesting articles in the Comments section. The first by Federico Pistero is titled “As tech threatens jobs, we must test a universal basic income.” An earlier healthy memory blog post, “The Second Machine Age,” reviewed a book by Erik Brunjolfsson & Andrew McAfee titled, “The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies”l predicted that many jobs, jobs that would be regarded as advanced, will disappear during this second machine age. Other healthy memory blog posts reviewed books whose authors argued that humanity’s “unique” capacity for empathy would still keep people employed. I wrote that there would not be enough jobs requiring this “unique” capacity to keep everyone employed, even if these skills could not be implemented with technology.
The comment piece by Pistero stated that it is possible that within 20 years almost half of all jobs will be lost to machines, and nobody really knows how we are going to cope with that. Pistero writes “One of the most interesting proposals, that doesn’t rely on the fanciful idea that the market will figure it out, is an unconditional basic income (UBI).
A UBI would provide a monthly stipend to every citizen, regardless of income or employment status. A key criticism of the UBI is that it would kill the incentive to work. However, research cited by Pistero involving a whole town in Canada and 20 villages in India found that not only did people continue working, but they were more likely to start businesses or perform socially beneficial activities compared with controls. Moreover, thee was an increase in general well-being , and no increase in alcohol, drug use, or gambling.
Of course, this research needs to be replicated, but it is good to know that this problem is being researched. The poverty resulting from large scale unemployment would be devastating.
A second article in the same Comment section by Laura Smith is titled “Pay people a living wage and watch them get healthier.” Paying the lowest earners less than a living wage, which occurs in both the US and the UK, leaves full-time workers unable to lift their families our of poverty. The problem goes far beyond unpaid bills.
Poverty keeps people from resources such as healthcare and safe housing. People in poverty experience more wear and tear from stress than the rest of us, they are sicker, and they die earlier. Children living in poverty are more likely to be depressed and to have trouble in school. Newborns are more likely to die in infancy. Poor people are marginalized. They often live outside the scope of therapeutic, vocational, social, civic, and cultural resources. This experience of “outsiderness” reduces cognitive and emotional function. Brain activity associated with social exclusion has been shown to parallel that of bodily pain.
Research addressing the question of whether raising people’s incomes would improve their health looked at the impact of a community-wide income rise when a casino was built on a Cherokee reservation in North Carolina. The research compared psychiatric assessments of children before and after this even. Children’s symptom rates began to decline. By the fourth year out of poverty, the symptom rates could not be distinguished from children who had never been poor.
© Douglas Griffith and healthymemory.wordpress.com, 2015. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Douglas Griffith and healthymemory.wordpress.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.