The title of this post is identical to an article by Michael Brooks in the Features Section of the 1 Apr 2017 New Scientist. The article begins, “NULIUS in verba: “take nobody’s word for it”. This is the motto of the Royal Society, the UK’s national academy of science. This encapsulates the spirit of scientific inquiry. The article continues, “Thanks to what science tells us about human physiology, the universe’s history, nature’s forces and Earth’s geology, flora and fauna, we know the earth isn’t flat, the universe is nearly 14 billion years old, and that there are no dragons or unicorns. We live longer and in more comfort, and can send space probes to the edge of the universe.
But there are people who still contend the earth is flat. Other people say the universe is 6000 years old. Still others doubt the the theory of evolution by natural selection. And there are people who question the reality of human-made climate change. Unfortunately, some of these people are in positions of power like Donald Trump and his appointees. For this, HM apologizes to the rest of the world. However, a majority of the American voters did not vote for Trump. Trump did not win the popular vote. He was elected by an electoral college, an institution developed to deny the principle of one citizen, one vote.
What is worse is there is an industry devoted to publishing and promoting scientific lies (see the healthy memory blog post, “Lies, Inc). It needs to be understood that the scientific facts cited above could change. Science is always an approximation of the truth. Absolute truth is a destination we will likely never reach. But to change science, experiments that produce data are required. And there must be a means of disproving scientific theories. There must be a way of disproving creationism, or it is not a scientific theory. And there are arguments that question human-made climate change. Unfortunately, some of these arguments come from Lies, Inc. However, to be fair, there are scientists who question not the effects of humans on climate change, but on the rate at which these effects are taking place. In this case, the opinion goes to the majority of research that argues climate change is real and is increasing at an alarming rate.
Philosopher Edward Hall of Harvard says “Authority in science is earned—at least, when a scientific community is functioning well—by predicting and more generally at analyzing empirical phenomena.”
© Douglas Griffith and healthymemory.wordpress.com, 2017. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Douglas Griffith and healthymemory.wordpress.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.